Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Coffee Bean Essay Example for Free

Coffee Bean Essay Currently, the price of coffee in the market is very high, but farmers receive less money than what they do. Furthermore, when world coffee prices rise, the price that customers pay in the shops usually goes up too. Yet, when world coffee prices fall, the price in the shops doesnt come down. According to www. newint. org, coffee is a multi-million dollar industry, but the profits dont go to the farmers who actually work so hard to grow the coffee beans, and carry all the risks of failing crops or falling prices. Most of the profits go to the shippers, roasters and retailers. For example, while a cup of coffee costs $4-5, farmers get only 10% of that cost. To sum up, this is unfair with farmers who should receive more money for their coffee products. Besides the price of coffee beans is low, speculators also make the price pressure with the farmers’ productions. For example, after harvesting the coffee beans, farmers immediately have to sell their products to collect the capital and prepare for next season. That is the reason why farmers don’t have good price. In order to get price stability, Fair Trade has emerged to help farmers with their products. According to www. fairtrade. net, Fair Trade coffee producers are small family farms organized in cooperatives or associations which the farmers own and govern democratically. So, after joining Fair Trade, the price of coffee beans will be stable when farmers have harvested it. To sum up, farmers are not only more money but also depend on price. However, there are lower quality coffee beans which are sold at a price equal to the price of good quality coffee through fair trade. If farmers joined in Fair Trade, all their products which are good or bad also sold the same price that is not fair. According to www. ssireview. org, Fair Trade-certified coffee is growing in consumer familiarity and sales, but strict certification requirements are resulting in uneven economic advantages for coffee growers and lower quality coffee for consumers. Farmers are selling a different thing than they are producing. For instance, 1 bag of good quality coffee is sold at higher price than 1 bag of lower quality coffee in the market. If farmers joined in Fair Trade, those two bags would sell the same price. To sum up, farmers should not receive more money with their lower products. Besides, to be able to earn more money, while the price of coffee beans in the market isn’t high, farmers need to have more products which sell to raise their income. That reason why the government should support about the capital and lower interest rates those farmers can produce more productions. In addition, the government should invest for research new varieties with higher yields. For instance, the government will lend to farmers to buy materials, after the harvest, farmers would pay back for the government. All in all, if there are more yields and productions, farmers would earn more money without lower price.

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

CArloos Santana :: essays research papers

Carlos Santana Ryan Conroy All the world knows the special magic of Carlos Santana. Since 1966, he has led the group that bears his name, selling over 30 million albums and performing before an estimated 13 million people. In every performance, Carlos shares with his audience a personal communication that crosses all boundaries and differences. Carlos was introduced to traditional music by his father, Jose. An accomplished mariachi violinist and experienced musician, he taught Carlos the basics of music theory and gave him an understanding of the value of a note. Although Carlos' excitement for music would be sparked by his first experience, he quickly discovered the limits of its traditional form and wanted more. Carlos wanted to play the kind of music that was filling the radio waves and making people dance. Tijuana, 1955 the drastic change of moving from the small, quiet town of Autlan to the humming, thriving boom town of Tijuana brought a renewed hope and opportunity for a new life. Both for Carlos and his family. The eight-year old Carlos quickly left the violin for the guitar, studying and emulating the sounds of B.B. King, T-Bone Walker and John Lee Hooker. Soon he was being asked to join local bands like the T.J.'s, where he added a unique touch and feel to his own renditions of all the great songs of the 1950's. As he continued to play with different bands along the busy Tijuana Strip, he not Page Two only started to perfect his style and sound, but actually started bringing home enough money to really help his family. His future looked promising. In 1960, Carlos' family moved to San Francisco while Carlos stayed in Tijuana for another year to make extra money until his family was settled. However, he soon found himself amid the multicultural atmosphere of San Francisco, with all of its diverse musical styles. It was here that Carlos would find what he had been searching for, as if destiny had brought him to the right place at the right time. For the next five years, Carlos continued to evolve his own unique style of music that would later identify him as one of the most distinctive, innovative musicians of our time. In 1966, the music of Carlos Santana exploded on the streets of San Francisco with the debut performance of the Santana Blues Band. For the next two years, the Santana Blues Band was overwelmed by a wave of popularity that would take them from San Francisco's Fillmore West, to that historical performance in 1969 before 500,000 at the Woodstock Festival in New York.

Sunday, January 12, 2020

Barack Obama’s Speech †Global Village Essay

The term Global Village is defined as a world that is globally connected by all forms of media. Basically, people’s personal experience while living in a global context has affected their attitudes about the world. Throughout â€Å"A New Beginning† speech, Obama debates that living within a modern society based on the concept of Global Village, the American’s and Muslims should respect one another and cooperate. His goal is to unify the Western world with the Islamic by promoting tolerance and change. The president depicts the positive and negative aspects of Global Village where the American beliefs and values of equality, peace and responsibility are developed by literary techniques incorporated to employ ideas surrounding this. This allows the audience to gain a deeper understanding about his purpose of the speech, and what he aims to gain from it. The speech evaluates the positive aspects of Global Village, where he highlights the advantages including the connection between cultures and better education about the world’s changing views. The president’s main concentration was based on America’s responsibility as a country to help Iraq develop a better future. The extended repetition of the word â€Å"responsibility† emphasises that issues raised are not based on the individual but on a global responsibility to change to the better. The influence of Global Village has allowed better communication between America and Iraq, where America has agreed to remove all American troops from Iraq. This has ensured trust and unity, portraying â€Å"Iraq as a partner and never as a patron†. The use of simile and contrast between the words â€Å"partner† and â€Å"patron† signifies equality and partnership. Obama continues explaining about the detrimental history experienced by women, focusing on gender equality. He does this by conveying the importance of the issues of woman’s rights currently faced on a global scale too. The quote â€Å"I reject the view that woman who choose to cover her hair is somehow less equal but believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality†. This depicts the president successfully appealing to the Islamic audience, rejecting the stereotype that women who wear the hijab are less equal, but puts forward his belief that women who are denied education on a global scale are denied equality. There is a constant debate about this issue, however Obama strives to achieve equality for woman in Islamic culture through â€Å"expanded literacy for girls, and to help young women pursue employment†¦Ã¢â‚¬  and to â€Å"live their dreams†. To juxtapose against the positive aspects of Global Village presented within the speech, Obama also addresses the negative consequences of this which consist of the violent extremists and the development of harmful weapons in the modern world of today. Here the president confronts this issue in all of its forms through the belief that â€Å"people of all faiths reject: the killing of innocent men, women, and children†. The situation involving the American troops in Afghanistan signify a â€Å"war of choice†, he speaks about the war, rather than acknowledging what has been done wrong such as the troops still continuing to fight in the war, unable to return back to America because of the uncertainty that â€Å"violent extremists in Afghanistan and Pakistan determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can†. This leads to the partnering with forty-six countries that will strengthen the security of America. The issue discussed in the speech about the evolution of weaponry is concerning, as Barack Obama has decided that â€Å"no nations hold nuclear weapons†. With this quote, he ensures to all listeners and people around the world his own personal views and efforts in changing these legislations to make it an equal and safe world for everyone where nuclear weapons will not be considered an international issue anymore. However, if nuclear weapons are needed, they must oblige â€Å"under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty†. To make it a fair result, Obama has not completely banned the use of such weapons, but rather incorporated laws to reduce the risks of danger to appear. Thus, â€Å"A New Beginning† speech by Barack Obama exemplifies the advantages and disadvantages of Global Village and his view on not only America’s future, but directed towards an international scale. He has explained his efforts into what he plans to change countries to receive a better future, intending that â€Å"the people of the world can live together in peace. We know that is God’s vision†. This allows responders to understand the importance of Global Village and the impacts it can cause to the world globally.

Saturday, January 4, 2020

Minimum Wage Increase - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1380 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2019/05/15 Category Law Essay Level High school Tags: Minimum Wage Essay Did you like this example? How would you feel if you were working many hours at work and were still not able to provide for your familys basic necessities? Employees are working very hard, long hours and are not receiving the pay that they need. People need to provide for themselves and their families and are unable to do so with such low pay. People should not be living the rest of their lives in poverty and they should be able to pay for what they need. The Federal minimum wage should increase in order for people to support themselves and get paid what they deserve. The current minimum wage that people are working for is unfair. According to Josh Newby in Pensacola Magazine, minimum wage should be $18.28 to keep pace with labor productivity (Newby). Minimum wage needs to increase a lot more than it is right now if we want workers to get paid what they deserve. People cannot be expected to provide for themselves and their families by receiving such low pay. If minimum wage is raised, people will not have to be constantly worrying if they will have enough money for basic necessities including food, housing, and utilities. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Minimum Wage Increase" essay for you Create order As this amount of minimum wage increase might seem a bit unrealistic, The Policy Institute states in its website that that by 2024, minimum wage should increase to at least $15 an hour. About 18 percent of the U.S. workforce [including] California, New York, and the District of Columbia (The Public Policy) agreed that they wanted minimum wage to increase to $15 an hour. If minimum wage does increase, about 41 million workers would benefit. (The Public Policy). So many workers and families will be better off with a minimum wage increase. Robert Pollin and Jeanette Wicks-Lim state in The Journal of Economic Issues that they also believe minimum wage should be increased to $15 an hour. If minimum wage is increased, there will be a tremendous difference in the life of a preschool teacher, bank teller, or fast-food worker who today struggles to get by on around $20,000 a year (The Public Policy). So many lives will change for the better with an increase in minimum wage and $15 an hour seems to be reasonable. Some people do not understand how much childen at home are affected while their parents are at work. A book titled Making It Work: Low-Wage Employment, Family Life, and Child Development by Edward D. Lowe, et al. explains how a womans job can affect the development of her children. It is common that if a childs mom is working long hours and receiving a low income, the child may become depressed and anxious (Lowe, et al.). If parents were able to work shorter hours and still be able to have the money they need to survive, their children will be overall a lot happier because they will not have to be separated from their parents as long. Teachers can see a huge difference in children whose parents work long hours to pay for basic needs versus parents who are able to spend quality time with their children. It was stated that children do better in school when their mother has a higher income. Children who are unable to be near their parents a lot are seen to have higher levels of aggression and acting-out behaviors (Lowe, et al.). Mothers and fathers are unable to spend a lot of time with their children when they are working many hours to try to make ends meet. Parents love to be home after school and at dinnertime to monitor homework and make dinner (Lowe, et al.). If minimum wage is raised, parents will not have to work as many hours and they will have time to build strong connections with their children. When parents are at work, they worry about what their children might be up to. They stress about their childrens whereabouts or behavior after school and the quality of the attention they could provide to their children after long work hours. They also worry if the amount of money they made that day will be enough for food that night (Lowe, et al.). When they are at work, they cannot check up on their children at any time to make sure they are okay or that they are not getting into trouble. All states should have an increased minimum wage so basic necessities can be paid for. In a newspaper article called Arkansas Minimum Wage Increase Proposal Makes It on November Ballot by Meagan Johnson, she states why raising minimum wage in Arkansas is a good idea. Over one hundred thousand signatures were submitted by campaign manager Kristen Foster which support the increase of minimum wage. Foster stated that every Arkansan who is working full time should be able to afford to feed their kids, have a house to live in (Johnson). Their basic needs should be met and the pay for minimum wage right now does not work for everyone. Everyone should be seen as equal and when there is a low minimum it is impossible for this to happen. In a journal called Is Raising the Minimum Wage a Good Idea? Evidence and Implications for Social Work by Jennifer L. Romich, workers that are being paid very little demand a higher wage as a matter of fairness, calling minimum wage a critical civil and human rights issue (Romich). Low paid workers believe that getting a higher wage is what is fair in our society. Workers wages are not able to provide for basic social needs, including housing, food, and other reasonable needs (Romich). If low paid workers start to make more money, people would be seen as more equal and there would be less poverty. Living in poverty is something that citizens in our country should not have to do for the rest of their lives. America has enough money to have a class of working poor that can put food on the table (Newby). People should be able to provide for themselves and not have to worry about being able to eat at night or pay their bills. Others say that raising minimum wage disadvantages businesses (Newby). If businesses are losing money because their workers need to pay for basic needs, that is a good reason for them to lose a little money. Businesses should not be selfish and take all the money because they do not necessarily need it as much as low paid workers do. Everyone should be able to afford to pay for at least shelter and food and they are not able to because of the small amount they are getting paid now. Many people who believe minimum wage should not increase think that those with low wages tend to spend their money right away, which boosts the economy (Newby). While this statement is true, low paid workers spend their money quickly to buy basic necessities for themselves and their families. They are not able to save any money when all of their money goes to food and house bills. Some opposers believe that if minimum wage is raised, employees will buy (hire) fewer workers as workers become more expensive (Romich). In our society today, so many low paid workers are not able to pay for what they need. Yes, maybe not as many people will get hired; but we should at least be able to have a good amount of people to make it in this world we live in today instead of no one. If minimum wage is raised, more families will not have to live in poverty and their stress levels will decrease tremendously. In conclusion, minimum wage should increase so that workers can support themselves. If minimum wage stays at the amount it is, more employees are going to end up in a state of poverty. People should not have to worry if they will be able to pay for dinner for their families or pay house bills. Parents are working many hours when they should be spending valuable time with their children. These parents childrens mental health is being affected by this separation. If minimum wage is increased, it will allow low paid workers to not have to worry about whether or not they will be able to provide for themselves and their families.